Jamie Critchlow Downward Spiral Continues

13 Mar

Alarming new developments regarding fired Fox C-6 administrator and Topix scandal suspect Jamie Critchlow have been revealed in a court filing relating to his child custody agreement with his ex-wife. I reported on his double DWIs, from incidents in July 2014 and January 2015, here. But those were only one reason said ex-wife has moved for full custody. Here is an excerpt from her court filing from January 2016 (the case number is 10JE-DR00626-01). In the excerpt below, “Father” is Jamie Critchlow, “Mother” is the ex-wife, and “Father’s wife” is former Fox superintendent Dianne Critchlow:


Critchlow custody court filing 1-12-16

In a counterclaim, Critchlow actually asks for a reduction in his child support requirement, stating that his income is only about half of what it was when he was at Fox. It is not surprising that an overpaid school administrator can’t find a similar salary outside of public education.

In related Fox news, the state audit of the district should be released in April, at long last.


3 Responses to “Jamie Critchlow Downward Spiral Continues”

  1. Anonymous March 13, 2016 at 3:52 pm #

    He can afford a vacation in Aruba but can’t afford child support?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Laura March 13, 2016 at 10:16 pm #

    I understand the want to share this article…however it seems to me very clear of the kind of individual this man is….However unfortunately there are still two children involved in this whole “ordeal” we will call it, and by publishing this, it is going to hurt them more than it is the man who has done all the wrongs!!!! Tonight alone across my Facebook feed I have seen this article three times and I do not even belong to the school district…. Maybe just maybe people could think about all of those affected by this…bc now those poor children are going to have to relive this all over again bc yet another article is being plastered everywhere about their lives!!!! Just a thought….


    • wrongonred March 14, 2016 at 10:52 am #

      Why not blame Jamie for his own actions? He seems to present a clear and present danger to the community. Should we let the community be endangered as a result of a desire to protect his kids? Most of those meth heads featured in the blotter have kids as well, should their transgressions go hidden to protect their children? While it is unfortunate that the children have to deal with this, the person who is to blame is their father.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: